On the track to Taranaki Falls at Ruapehu, my friends and I came across two elderly men deep in discussion. They walked ahead of us slowly, absorbed in their topic. One of them stopped suddenly in the middle of the track and squared off against his friend to emphasise a point. "And I'll tell you why," I heard him say as he waggled his finger.
We sidled past. The two men laughed when they realised their debate was blocking the track. "Just solving the world's problems," one of them said amicably.
As we left them behind, my friends and I agreed we hoped to be like those two old guys one day, cheerfully solving the world's problems with smiles on our faces.
I haven't cracked it yet myself, but I remain a cheerleader for amicable disagreement. It's one of the things I have tried to do as a columnist. We can get so easily caught up with who is right and who is wrong, with who screwed up and who didn't, when a bit of respect and willingness to listen probably goes further than winning the argument in most cases.
Nothing is simple. Everything is complicated. There are two, three, four sides to every story. Just when I think I know something for sure, I discover another angle. It is humbling and it can make lobbing my opinion into the public domain nerve-wracking at times.