If they perceived it was safe, more people would rides bicycles. If more people cycled there would be fewer cars on the road and less congestion. Therefore, "emphasis on the interests of the cycling community" is very much in the interest of motorists.
Andrew Thorpe
Welcome Bay
Consultation process
There appears to be a worrying trend emerging regarding the Tauranga City Council community consultation process.
This was highlighted in an article (News, May 24), in which Max Pedersen who reviewed the Greerton Gridlock debacle last September and found the City Council's culture to be at fault and in particular "its community consultation process".
I find it disturbing that in four recent community consultation processes the only information provided for the community to consider were those in favour of the project the council wanted to undertake.
It has been reported that many residents and shop owners in Greerton would not have supported the so-called upgrade had they been told that the traffic would become more congested through Greerton.
The residents in Pāpāmoa would also agree that they were not properly informed about a recent native planting programme, and after an uproar it has since been amended.
Recently, I attended a community open day to showcase the proposed walkway from the Strand to Memorial Park.
A large poster contained a list of 12 benefits this proposed walkway would bring to the city.
In contrast, not one disadvantage was listed such as loss of privacy, security, environmental impacts and increased congestion to name but a few.
When questioned about the bias this information represented, I was told that the council wanted to "sell this idea to the public", therefore no negative impacts were presented.
An article "Fighting to save the Reserve" (News, May 15) concerned the proposed building of a Marine Research and Education Centre in the Marine Park.
Local resident Jim Beard felt the community consultation process was biased in support of the university's plans and that the negative impacts had been minimised.
For the community consultation process to have any meaning in decision making, such a systematic bias of information presented to the public needs to be addressed so that properly informed decisions can be made.
Dr Meg Butler
Welcome Bay
Budget comes early
I remember growing up in the UK in the late 1950s and early 1960s and then in New Zealand, my parents on Budget night more or less glued to either the radio or TV to learn how the yearly Budget would affect our family of mum, dad and four children.
Does anyone do this nowadays? We have been told for the past two months, money being allocated to various areas, groups etc, so what is left for Budget?
We are told what organisations are not going to get any money. I guess this is progress in the media and political world.
Wendy Galloway
Omokoroa
headline
It was encouraging to read Andrew Lattimore's letter (Letters, May 29) about the inexcusable delays to repairing the Mount base track.
Notwithstanding the council's apparent inaction, we are now well into our third year awaiting repairs.
So many of our citizens and visitors are unable to manage the temporary stairways and are consequently denied access to walking around their beloved Mount.
Ray Malcolm
Mount Maunganui
The Bay of Plenty Times welcomes letters from readers. Please note the following:
• Letters should not exceed 200 words.
• They should be opinion based on facts or current events.
• If possible, please email.
• No noms-de-plume.
• Letters will be published with names and suburb/city.
• Please include full name, address and contact details for our records only.
• Local letter writers given preference.
• Rejected letters are not normally acknowledged.
• Letters may be edited, abridged, or rejected at the Editor's discretion.
• The Editor's decision on publication is final.
Email editor@bayofplentytimes.co.nz
