However, it seems these principles went out the window if it became legally necessary to stay at home with your child because your school won't allow them in.
Visiting British academic Dr Ben Goldacre remarked to NZME that the medical profession and the drug companies have to take some responsibility for the "facts" of how medicine works.
How clinical trials are done, how the evidence is gathered, how that is turned into action and decision-making.
But, he argues, if evidence-based medicine is done behind closed doors, it paves the way for quacks to walk in and exploit the fears found among the public.
He makes a good point in that I generally trust a person in a white coat telling me something is good for me. I also believe in the efficacy and necessity of inoculations against disease.
But I don't know how it works, and the argument of requiring a medical degree sounds a bit pompous. It can be explained.
Conspiracy theorists and quacks have been around for a long time, and their behaviour isn't about to change.
Read more: Editorial: Sex assault letter sends real message
There are also a lot of people who will have their beliefs and ignore the evidence. They have a different relationship to the truth, as Dr Goldacre says.
If you want your children to live, get them vaccinated. If you want the best chance of being cured, go to a doctor. If you want to try something that makes you feel a bit more comfortable about life, the universe and everything, then sure, homeopathy's an option.
They'll probably tell you how it works in great detail. But according to Dr Goldacre, it's a pity medical science doesn't do the same.