In the early morning hours between groggy and semi-conscious, a doctor placed an A4 sheet of paper in my hands and asked me to sign. "We need to intubate your husband," she said. "He's struggling to breathe."
It was the first time I felt the weight of legal responsibility as a spouse. Sean had become ill with what we'd mistaken for swine flu. Within hours, he had gone from emergency room to hospital ward to intensive care.
Other forms had been sitting in our lounge for months - ones spelling out end-of-life wishes: would either of us want to be kept alive if we were unlikely to regain mental function? Would we want tube feedings? Prolonged intubation? We'd answered no, no, no. An advance directive was an academic exercise. Until it wasn't.
Would either of us go one step further and ask to end our lives early if we were dying anyway? We never got to answer the question. Sean died of complications from surgery in 2010.
A poll out earlier this week found 75 per cent of 1300 Kiwis surveyed favoured a law change allowing terminally ill people with irreversible, unbearable suffering to be helped to end their lives peacefully.
One News/Colmar Brunton and Three News/Reid Research polls in 2015 found similar support. Right to Life groups, religious conservatives and other opponents say state-sanctioned euthanasia is a fast-track to normalising all suicide.
They say it puts vulnerable people such as the poor, the depressed and the elderly at increased risk because the temptation to save government dollars or take grandma's fortune asap is too great to resist.
Their arguments miss the mark - assisted dying is already happening here. A study published in the July, 2015 New Zealand Medical Journal of 650 doctors found nearly 66 per cent who had contact with the patient prior to death reported making a medical decision at the end-of-life in the 12 months before the survey.
Of those, 88 per cent reported increasing alleviation of pain and/or symptoms with the probability death may be hastened. Four and a half per cent of doctors attributed death to a drug that had been given explicitly for the purpose of hastening the patient's death.
I asked a physician friend who has practised medicine around the world about euthanasia. He sat for a decade on a US hospital ethics committee and said many patients with advanced care plans stating "no life support" later changed their minds.