It's difficult to find something to read about other than the Rugby World Cup these days but an interesting article caught my eye this week.
According to proposed changes, a level three NCEA English component that asks students to respond critically to a Shakespearean drama will expire next year and not be replaced. This reinforces the long-running debate about keeping Shakespeare in the school curriculum.
It is the last Shakespeare-specific unit in the English curriculum and losing it would mean studying the great Bard will now be the decision of the teacher.
Depending on who you talk to, the response varies, from the absolutely delighted teenagers who have found and continue to find Shakespeare boring, dull and totally irrelevant, to the moderately concerned who, while understanding it might not be everybody's cup of tea, believe it should still be taught, to the passionate followers of literature who liken removing Shakespeare from the English curriculum to removing the periodic table from chemistry.
My teenage sons would probably be horrified that their mother would be suggesting that this is wrong, however, I have it on good authority that they won't read this because they don't read anything. Despite years of following the advice of the plethora of parenting manuals we possess we have failed dismally to inspire our boys to read.