"The proposed public art framework seeks to make a bold change in the way in which we engage with public art.
"The framework aims to engage and enable an ambitious programme of public art, which tells the stories of Tauranga, celebrates our artists and gives our community access to high-quality public art experiences."
The framework would fund, set out guidelines, provide a toolkit and promote public art as well as see the establishment of a public art panel, according to Wilson's report to council.
The panel would be made up of sector representatives with "suitable expertise" in public art and offer advice for projects from commission to installation.
Other objectives included promoting Tauranga as a centre of artistic and cultural excellence and to support the expression of Māori whakapapa and history throughout the city through public art.
The proposed budget for the fund is a 'per cent for art' that would allocate 1 per cent of capital budgets for above-ground council-led projects to public art outcomes.
Under this model, $3 million would be allocated to the public art budget for the 2023/24 financial year, subject to the annual plan process. Currently, there is no dedicated budget for public art.
Wilson worked with Sonya Korohina and Ellie Smith of Supercut Projects, a creative industries consultancy that supported public art installations in Tauranga's CBD, to produce the framework.
Council commission chairwoman Anne Tolley said the previous policy "achieved little public art in Tauranga".
"There is a dearth of public art in Tauranga, so we are looking to get a massive improvement," she said.
Tolley and commissioner Bill Wasley wanted the public art panel to have a degree of independence and remove politics from decision-making.
"Public art is controversial, it should be controversial," said Tolley. "Art is controversial because it depends on individual taste and too often you see public art interfered with by politics."
Wasley said they needed to look at potential opportunities for the panel to have a "significant degree of independence".
He said he was "struggling a bit" to see what would be added by projects needing to go to the council table.
To address this the committee added a recommendation to the framework objectives that the panel be delegated authority to make decisions within budget, with the exception of significant installations that would have operational implications.
Committee member Bruce Robertson wanted to ensure the 'per cent for art' model could fit the budget.
"I like the idea of the 1 per cent, it makes a lot of sense, but we've all agreed it's a lot of money," he said.
"It's great to have something in principle, but this policy falls over if we can't fund it. "We need to really give it our best shot to make certain that what is exciting everybody, actually can be delivered."
Community services general manager Barbara Dempsey said because the committee was making an in-principle decision there was more "diving into detail" that would be done on the framework.
The committee adopted the Public Art Framework and objectives in principle and council staff would report back later in the year before it was formally adopted.