New Zealand should reap more gains than losses in a worldwide clampdown on multinational firms using complicated structures to avoid paying tax, Revenue Minister Michael Woodhouse says.
The country is taking part in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) efforts to plug gaps in international rules that have enabled global companies to shift profits to other jurisdictions harbouring low or no tax environments. While that will likely have an impact on New Zealand firms with international operations, Woodhouse told parliament's finance and expenditure select committee that the country should come out ahead due to its suite of double tax arrangements and agreements with other nations.
"My sense is that when the noose is tightened around these countries we will probably be net beneficiaries of the tax base," he said.
In October last year, EY international tax partner Andy Archer said he expected New Zealand's 20 biggest companies would face increased regulatory costs as a result of the OECD's base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project, which could also lead to higher tax bills.
Woodhouse said New Zealand has been phasing in a number of initiatives that meet the BEPS guidelines, including changes to thin line capitalisation and transfer pricing rules, information sharing agreements, and is looking at the hybrid mismatch and interest limitation framework. At the same time, IRD has been working to lift compliance and is actively case-managing the top 50 companies by turnover on a one-to-one basis.
