Capital gains tax is a big topic of debate at the moment, although David Cunliffe's Labour camp may want to forget his policy fumble in the recent debate.
On the face of it you can understand the reasoning behind the tax. It can be galling for young people still unable to buy a home to watch asset-rich baby-boomers cash in the tax-free gains their rental properties have created over recent decades.
It's not unusual for Auckland properties to have doubled in value many times. But because that is a capital gain, not income, there's no tax payable on the resulting windfall when it's time to sell.
But, and this is a really big but, I can't see how a capital gains tax is going to be workable.
It seems to me that as soon as you start adding exceptions to a tax it becomes ineffectual. And this policy has a lot of exemptions. There's the family home, for a start. Then personal assets, collectibles, small business assets sold for retirement and payouts from KiwiSaver. There's even an exemption for people who've built up a small business and sell it: They'll get their first $250,000 gain tax-free. Homes in trusts apparently won't be taxed.