JOHN MARTIN
Owhango
River a person?
I was always taught that there are three types of physical beings -- animal, mineral or vegetable (plants).
I'm not sure what the river is now that it is a being with a legal identity? All I know that this nonsense is going to come back to bite us.
DAVID BENNETT
Whanganui
Abortion debate
With an upcoming election, it is interesting that we are seeing the abortion debate resurfacing in the political consciousness.
While the Labour Party may have a point when they say that abortion should not be viewed as a crime, nevertheless there is an important moral issue at stake. Andrew Little has said abortion should be the free choice of the women involved. Abortion advocates have trotted out the same cliched argument for decades: "It's my body".
Yes, the body of a pregnant woman is involved, and anyone treating her medically has to have her permission. But there is another body involved -- that of the unborn child. No one asks its permission, and that is the difficulty that makes "it's my body" a meaningless argument.
Whether we like it or not, an unborn child is a human being with rights that are all too often ignored in this debate. Anyone who knows anything about foetal development knows that an unborn child is recognisable as a human being from a very early stage in its development. It is a small clump of cells for a very short time before organs start to develop.
When we realise that an unborn child is a human being, killing it becomes a problem, and we must face the fact that abortion is the killing of an unborn child. I could call it "murder", but that would introduce an emotional bias into a debate where rational, wise decisions need to be made.
It is probably obvious by now that I do not favour abortion. I believe that it should only be permitted if serious emotional trauma of the mother is likely. This would probably occur if the woman involved was pregnant as a result of rape, for example.
Serious emotional trauma should not include the fear of not being able to provide for the child. It seems that in today's world, adoption is rarely considered, even though there are plenty of childless couples who would love to adopt.
All too often babies are aborted because they are just "inconvenient".
DAVID GASH
Whanganui
Flood protection
It's refreshing to read a number of letters from people who have some understanding regarding flooding.
M Hughes (letters, March 6) makes some valid points regarding a commercial property owner asking for greater flood protection in Taupo Quay.
This is little different from a person who buys a badly flooded Wanganui East home then goes public, demanding increased stopbanks for his now-restored house. In other words, he wants the ratepayers to increase the value of his property.
Anzac Pde roadway and the houses coming off this road are in what was the old riverbed and flood plain. Side roads coming off Anzac Pde, you will notice, all go uphill out of the flood plain.
When I was on the regional council, I asked the local district council why were they still issuing building permits for houses in a flood plain and not implementing "managed retreat". The CEO fired straight back: "Managed retreat is not on our agenda". This showed the mindset of most of the council. It was in the too-hard basket that flood banks don't work and flooding was increasing worldwide. Palmerston North has massive 500-year stopbanks, and some of the more intelligent people are asking Horizons "What next?" Residents are complaining of the sun being blocked out of their houses and gardens and people walking along the tops of these banks looking into their homes.
Finally, I will not respond to letter-writers who don't understand the concept of flood plains and wasting money on stopbanks. There is enough information worldwide on so-called stopbanks bursting or "overtopping". Take time to study it before you burst into print. (Abridged)
BOB WALKER
Whanganui
