A petition was compiled with 1800 signatures of local citizens. This was done carefully avoiding the use of social media so as to minimise the risk that this matter would attract the attention of outside participation and such publicity as might reflect negatively upon our city - as has happened in the past when local controversy has been exploited for creation of more heat than light.
Signatures were collected in person, either door-to-door or at a specific locale like the market, and then presented to council at its special session on the Quay development, held on Tuesday, March 25.
The special session was marked by the way that the process of bringing facts to light can support genuine democracy, in permitting our representative body to deliberate and make informed decisions based on the presentation of the entire complexity.
The active participation of council members on both sides of the issue with acute listening and perceptive questioning was a welcome change from past experiences.
Powerco's representatives were candid as could be, although their presentation was handicapped by their having relied for some judgment on contractors not present for the meeting. They acknowledged that the present cable had been in place for 50 years with few or no problems from trees and their roots, themselves present now for 130 years.
An idea had been floated that the trees were near the end of their lifespan - this was refuted by the arborist viewpoint very ably put forth by Phil Thomsen and Colin Ogle. They provided the science behind the expectation that these hardy trees could live for decades more.
Cath Watson and Marie McKay did an exceptional job of presenting well-researched evidence to show not only the beauty of the trees and their social utility but the economic value which is estimated city-wide at $40 million.
Based upon these facts, council decided it had an alternative: to reconsider the Quay development plan in a way that would preserve the trees.
The decision shows council is capable of exercising deliberative good judgment when concerned citizens do the hard work of providing well-researched information. The information was provided by a citizens' group who sacrificed time, effort - and, yes, money - for the good of the whole community.
These people who acted so generously may well be relied upon to form another group - that is, a group devoted to furthering the prosperity of the city by getting together to encourage younger families and businesses to come here.
We have a beautiful city, ennobled by a great river, situated with a remarkable coast. Moreover, we have a talented and highly motivated citizenry, which came together to promote the common good. That strength needs to be harnessed as energy to grow our city.