Globalisation is one of the buzz words of this century. It is uttered with all manner of implications, positive and negative, despondent and optimistic. We are told that the world has become increasingly integrated, that countries are losing their uniqueness and that this trend is inexorable.
Certainly, this does seem the case when we look at how easy it is to buy products from overseas and the ever-increasing rates of migration from one side of the world to another. Going to foreign countries is now rather comfortable and very familiar if one wants it to be. We can increasingly find our favourite stores or restaurants from New Zealand in distant continents. It is undeniable that globalisation exists, is growing, and has tangible effects.
However, this is a concept generally discussed in isolation, as I have done so above. I think we are making a mistake when we do this, because while globalisation is significant it is in no way consuming or overbearing. Real, observable and enjoyable differences exist which distinguish nations around the world.
Over the past few weeks I have been travelling with my family through Hong Kong, England, Ireland and France, with a few more countries in Europe to come. The single most striking facet of this trip has been the starkly contrasting cultures and the attitudes of the populations of different nations.
It is clear, and it is often not identified when globalisation is discussed, that a plethora of factors distinguish nations from one another. The climate of a nation, its history, its architecture, its natural beauty, the tourist attractions on offer; all characteristics which are massively variable when you consider different nations. New Zealand has vast tracts of plush green land, unrivalled by most other nations. Hong Kong has countless skyscrapers which are scarce in New Zealand. France has the type of monuments and tourists attractions which would look hilariously alien in most countries outside of Europe.