History has many recent examples of this fearful reaction. The Nazis banned anything composed or performed by Jews and anything critical of the regime. They reinforced their intent by sending those who challenged them to labour camps or simply shooting them. They then filled the gap with yodelling folk music that reinforced Aryan notions of nation and supremacy. While working as a musician in Europe years ago, I was on the same bill as a German folk singer who performed medieval songs of protest against the feudal hierarchy. I learned this music had been "deleted" from their musical history under Hitler as it was feared it might provoke resistance to the Nazi ideology.
Echoing that fear in more recent times, the military Government of Myanmar (Burma) imprisoned bands for singing lyrics critical of the regime. In Russia, criticism of Vladimir Putin by girl punk band Pussy Riot has seen them imprisoned.
While some governments have tried to ban what they see as the harmful influence of Western pop music, fearful it will undermine their authority, others have welcomed the colonisation of their own culture because it dilutes the power of indigenous folk music to articulate the issues of ordinary people.
Woody Guthrie is now regarded as a folk hero in the US but during the Great Depression, to sing This Land is Your Land was seen as a challenge to the wealthy ruling elite and, for a time, two of the middle verses that mentioned social injustice were left out of school songbooks - such is the power of song.
In Mali, music is regarded as integral to their culture. It has the richness and depth that comes from the accumulated layers of centuries of musical development. From here, it seems that the move by extremist groups to ban the joy of music will be like trying to catch lightning - they will only get burned.
Terry Sarten is a musician, writer and social worker.
Feedback email: tgs@inspire.net.nz