OPINION
Depending which side of the debate you are on, Artificial Intelligence or AI is either being talked up as a saviour or destroyer of life, creative work and the universe as we know it.
I am not sure whether the influence of AI was behind the print error in my column last week but it sure made a big difference in the meaning. The word “not” appeared instead of the word “now”. This changed the direction of an entire paragraph that was intended to say that “There is NOW clear evidence that recent flooding events will happen again and again requiring greater levels of financial rescue.”
The current advances in AI are clever but still fail to manage tasks we can do with our brains and bodies. The idea that some people are working to develop machines that can replace other people seems like another version of “why not because we can” – rather than advancing the human project.
We humans can do some very clever stuff. We have invented all sorts of ways to solve problems but it is not clear whether we are becoming more intelligent. Highly trained, skilled, intelligent people can save lives with complex health interventions. Diseases that virtually disappeared are now coming back because untrained, unscientific people are spreading false information that is not based in intelligent thought.