When I wrote last week's column as a spoof on spooks spying on the PM, I was unaware of the drama unfolding around Fonterra as a result of a dirty pipe contaminating baby food.
In that piece, I parodied the paranoid spying profession's ability to find conspiracy hidden in everything by using the PM getting instructions to remember to get some milk on the way home as being a coded reference to Fonterra.
I write my column usually on a Thursday evening for publication on Saturday morning. The notion of including Fonterra was to find the most unlikely place for a spy agency misunderstanding. Then what happens: Fonterra and the PM are now embroiled in an ever-growing scandal and the damage done to our international trading reputation is linked to one of the country's biggest exporters.
I guess it shows parody can have truth hidden somewhere inside the satire. The way this unfolded led me to ponder the nature of satire and its power to puncture pomposity and inflated egos. I imagine that there are people throughout history who have dared to challenge their rulers by making fun of them. I also suspect that many of these satirists didn't live very long when kings, queens, bishops and knights took exception to having the proverbial taken out of them by some lowly wit.
In 1726, Jonathan Swift wrote Gulliver's Travels, a book that is often considered the modern emergence of satire in literature. Many will know the story of how Gulliver becomes shipwrecked on an island inhabited by the Lilliputs, tiny people who then struggle to maintain things as they always have been following the arrival of a giant.