NZ is not on the list of potential threats, so we would certainly have the element of surprise on our side. WHAT'S the situation here?
A recent read gave me a new word and potential future career. The current situation provides the perfect time to become a situationalist - working within the "theory that behaviour is chiefly responsible for immediate situations".
The combination of stern academic tone and obscure meaning should be enough to forge a solid career. If it is possible to become a celebrity by being famous without any visible talent, then setting up as a situationalist should be doddle.
I will begin by using the example of the Blacks Caps' cricket result and proposing that being all out for 45 runs is linked to one of two things - either the opposition were stunningly brilliant or NZ were stunningly hopeless. Either way, the responsible behaviour is to be stunned.
Did the team neglect to make a New Year resolution to be winners? I note that the other newspaper I read did a little survey, asking whether people had made any 2013 resolutions and whether they would stick to them. The answers showed that 16 per cent had resolved with the intent to see it through and 6.8 per cent also made resolutions despite knowing they wouldn't be able to keep them. Then 54.2 per cent, counting myself among them, said they had not made any New Year resolutions for 2013. The really interesting group were the 22.9 per cent who declared they were perfect so therefore did not need to change anything. It must be hard to write with your tongue so firmly wedged in your cheek but I guess they can do that perfectly as well.