“We are needing to increase spending just to stand still and maintain existing levels of service.”
Increases in interest payments alone required a 6 per cent rate rise “before we even start to factor in supplier contract commitments and other factors”, he said.
“Many of our major contracts for maintaining critical infrastructure or services are linked to a relevant inflation index. This means the contracts adjust in response to inflation pressures and we have no choice but to absorb and then pass on the increase.”
For example, the waste management contract had increased by 18 per cent while inflation in the infrastructure area was up 15 per cent, both underpinned by significant jumps in operating costs such as fuel, materials and labour.
“Another impact of high inflation is that it pushes up asset valuations and, with it, depreciation costs which has implications for areas such as roading, which is a significant driver of rural rates,” Kirton said.
The combination of these cost pressures on the council was a starting point of a rates rise of 25 per cent, he said.
“In response, staff undertook a line-by-line budget review looking for potential savings and other mitigation options for council to consider,” Kirton said.
“This work resulted in a recommendation to council for an average 8.5 per cent rate rise and a debt level of $61 million.
“Council has asked staff to find a further 0.5 per cent of savings to get down to an average rate rise of 8 per cent, which is considered an absolute bare minimum because of interest rates and contract commitments.”
At its meeting on February 22, the council will decide on a proposed average rate rise which will go out for community feedback, with a final decision on the 2023/24 rate increase to be made at a meeting in June.