We know from the Letters page that the Chronicle will publish almost anything, but to write a regular column is a significant step up from that. Aside from quality writing, I think opinions that are original, progressive, and outside of the mainstream are more important to share in the press than those that simply reinforce the status quo or share one's personal domestic affairs.
Interestingly, the best feedback I have received on nearly 300 pieces in the Chronicle was the one following up on Duncan Garner's visit to the River City and some peoples' reactionary response to it. "Spot on" summarises the feedback I got on that opinion piece.
Kate is a great writer and she has original thoughts. For these reasons she is fully qualified to write a weekly column. I suspect those that question her qualifications are simply jealous. Is it any wonder the photo accompanying Kate's column showed a bunch of turkeys sitting on a fence?
To those turkeys I would simply say, "put up or shut up." In other words, have the courage to write a weekly column yourself and see what feedback you get on the Letters page.
The letters page is a valuable part of the Chronicle and a number of our community members use it as an informal weekly (or more frequent) column while others treat it more like a Twitter account. Any way you slice it, our local press is an invaluable forum for us to share almost any opinion.
Another great place to share opinions is in the comments section of online articles. I especially love reading the comments that accompany articles relating to home building in New Zealand. The following comments followed a recent article in the Herald titled: Videos of building horror stories no surprise, council inspectors say.
Here is one: "What a shock the most unreliable profession in the country does shonky work, who would have thought!"
Here is another: "When money can be earned as a fast rate by getting the job done and moving onto the next one, particularly in the housing market, then quality falls out the window.
When apprenticeships are ignored in favour of hiring cheap inexperienced labour, in the same market, then quality falls out the window.
When every man and his dog can get a basic qualification from a technical school, in many trades, then quality people are few and far between.
Just a few points that impact on things like new houses or buildings that show cheap often overrides quality. Why do a job properly when you can do it cheaply and unfortunately in New Zealand, we love cheap."
A point of clarification regarding the difference between cheap and thrifty, and specifically eco-thrifty:
Cheap in the short run is almost always expensive in the long run.
Eco-thrifty in the short run is almost always cheap in the long run.
In my experience, more problems that occur with buildings are caused by poor design rather than poor construction.
While there may be some shonky builders out there, most of the shonk falls firmly on the shoulders of architects and designers - in my opinion.
-Dr Nelson Lebo is an eco- design professional specialising in new builds, renovations, and healthy homes. Ph 022 635 0868 or 06 344 5013.
