Mass sentencing puts end to Turkey coup

In my trade you get used to it after a while, but the first time you wake up to find a military coup has happened where you live is quite alarming. That was in Turkey in 1971, when the army seized control after months of political turmoil.

It was not as bad as the 1960 coup, when the military authorities tried and hanged the prime minister, but it was bad enough.

Turkey had two more coups: in 1980, when half a million were arrested, thousands tortured, and 50 executed. In 1997, there was a "post-modern" coup in which the army simply ordered the prime minister to resign. But there will be no more coups in Turkey: the army has been forced to bow to a democratically elected government.

On September 21, a Turkish court sentenced 330 people, almost all military officers, to prison for their involvement in a coup plot in 2003. They included the former heads of the army, navy and air force, who received sentences of 20 years each, and six generals. Thirty-four other officers were acquitted.

Five years ago, nobody in Turkey could have imagined such a thing. The military were above the law, with the sacred mission (at least in their own minds) of defending the secular state from being undermined by people who mixed religion with politics. Making coups against governments that trespassed on that forbidden ground was just part of their job.

This was the duty that the 330 officers thought they were performing in 2003, according to the indictments. The Justice and Development Party (AKP), a moderate Islamic party espousing conservative social values, had come to power after the 2002 election: the voters had got it wrong again, and their mistake had to be corrected.

The accused 330 claimed that "Operation Sledgehammer" was all just a scenario for a military exercise, and the documents supporting the accusations (probably leaked by junior officers opposed to a coup) have never been properly attributed. But given the army's track record of four coups in 50 years and its deeply rooted hostility to Islamic parties, the charges were entirely plausible, and in the end the court believed them.

Even now, many secular-minded people in Turkey do not trust the motives of an Islamic party in government. They still think the army is there to protect them from religious fanatics. Any attempt to curb its power is a conspiracy against the principle of the secular, neutral state.

But the Turkish secular state has never been neutral. From the time when Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and his companions, all military officers, rescued Turkey from the wreckage of the Ottoman empire after World War I, the state was at war with religion.

Today's Turkey is modern, powerful and prosperous, and there is no external threat.

It's high time for the Turkish army to stop waging a cold war against the part of the population who are still devoutly religious. They are entitled to the full rights of citizenship too, although they are not entitled to force their beliefs and values on everybody else.

That was the significance of AK's victories in the past three elections, and of the trials that have finally brought the army under control. The head of the Turkish armed forces and all three service chiefs resigned in July in protest against the trials of military personnel, but President Abdullah Gul promptly appointed a new head of the armed forces - who tamely accepted the post. It's over.

Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.