UPON reading the two-page Whanganui District Council's "Representation Review Final Proposal" (Chronicle, September 14) my first thought was what justification has the council for the expense incurred by expanding on to two pages that which could have been included in one and a half?
One does not see so much white spacing or excessive use of large fonts in any other part of this paper.
My next was about the number of ratepayers who responded to the initial proposal. Ten people out of a population of 45,500 responded! Why such a low response?
I doubt it was because of a lack of interest in what the council is doing, as the opinion pages of the Chronicle regularly contain letters from residents about that. I believe there is a simple explanation and it is that the council is not responsive to ratepayer's views or opinions. As evidence, I use one of the subjects referred to in this proposal, "Changing the name of the Rural Community Board".
On August 10 I sent a polite email to all seven members of the board asking for their personal reasons in voting to change the name. More than a month has passed and I have only one reply and that promptly from the chairman David Matthews, explaining that he was the only member who voted against the change. For this I thank you, David.
The other six members — elected by us to listen to us and represent us, the Wanganui rural ratepayers and residents — have ignored me.