ENDING Colombia's 51-year-old civil war has taken a very long time. The first ceasefire and peace talks began in 1984, and collapsed two years later. There was another unsuccessful attempt in 1991, and yet another, involving four years of negotiations, in 1998. It's a bit like porcupines having sex: you have to move very slowly and carefully, and it can still go wrong in the end.
But more than three years after the current round of peace talks got under way, the government of President Juan Manuel Santos and the leaders of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) are almost there. Last Tuesday they asked the United Nations Security Council to provide a one-year unarmed mission to supervise a ceasefire and the disarmament of FARC's forces.
It's still a tricky process. Take, for example, the case of the "false positives". In medical research, a false positive is a test that says a disease or condition is present when it actually isn't. In the Colombian civil war, "false positives" were civilians killed by the army even though they were not members of FARC. There were at least 3000 "false positives" between 2004 and 2008.
Moreover, the Colombian soldiers doing the killing knew the victims were not FARC members. The army was rewarding them for high body-counts, and they just needed more bodies to get their bonuses. When the scandal broke, several hundred of these murderers got long prison sentences - but these convictions could be overturned under the new "Special Peace Jurisdiction" that was agreed last December.
The key task now is to make it worthwhile for FARC members to disarm. The Special Peace Jurisdiction will hear confessions from guerilla fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, and determine the reparations they must make to victims and victims' families. But except in the most extreme cases, they will not be sent to jail.