YESTERDAY while I was airbrushing brides in the studio, listening to Radio New Zealand as I always do, a question by pit-bull interviewer Mary Wilson stopped my mouse in its tracks.
Speaking to a firefighter about this week's devastating fires, she asked the exhausted man this: "At its absolute worst, how is the situation right now?"
The question seemed reasonable enough and yet it neatly encapsulated everything about why I am no longer a journalist.
There is a saying in the trade that "if it bleeds, it leads" and while we can all probably understand that a certain level of drama and devastation is required to make a headline, Mary Wilson's question did go to show just how ingrained it is for journalists to "beat up" a story and always zoom in on the worst case scenario. As fires threaten people's homes and livelihoods, what is wrong with asking, "at its absolute best, how is the situation right now?".
I'm guilty myself of often focusing on the negative in these column inches. Perhaps that is because I've learned through personal and professional experience that rather than no news being good news, it is more accurate to say that good news is no news.