AS A BOY in the States, one of my favourite radio adventure programmes was The Shadow. The hero, Lamont Cranston, fighter for truth and justice, had the ability, "learned in the far East, to cloud men's minds". This gave him invisibility, something children occasionally endure by default. It's the clouding of minds that is of interest. And the unclouding. A miasmal mist probably wafts through the Beehive as our MP, Chester Borrows, newly freed from its influence, is able now to speak forthrightly as the man of conscience he is at root. The freedom of imminent retirement has sparked a new engagement on his part, providing a demonstrable independence and clarity of thought.
I had planned to write in praise of his outspoken recognition of the inequities in sentencing, indeed in every aspect of the criminal justice system, due to institutional racism, where a white rich kid got a wrist slap for assaulting a police officer, a crime that would net a brown poor kid jail time. That's a demonstration of Chester's courage to face difficult and unpleasant facts.
Who is in a better position than Mr Borrows, a former cop, a lawyer, and a Minister of Courts, to make such an assessment? His recent essay questions the justice of the criminal justice system, pointing to the reality that putting a man in prison often imprisons his family as well, a form of collective punishment, an activity our activists roundly condemn when it's done by other countries.
The present system is broken. It costs $92,000 per annum for each prisoner. For money equivalent to half what we spend on medication to treat our sick, we get a recidivism rate of 80 per cent. That's a success rate of 20 per cent. No student gets a pass with that score, and neither should our prisons. Violent offenders need to be locked up but for the non-violent, our failing system needs serious reconsideration.