IN the normal course I'd welcome a debate with someone taking issue with a column I wrote, providing that the debate were civil and based upon a shared respect for the factual. Honest debate is one means for trying to get at the truth by engaging with competing ideas, rooted in evidence, and respecting facts.
Unfortunately, that's not the case with the op-ed of Ken Orr (Chronicle, November 14), spokesperson for Right To Life.
Read more: Jay Kuten: RTL guilty of harassing PM
Jay Kuten: Dangers of empty obstruction
In addition to his failure to apologise or seriously address my accusation of sexual harassment where the PM's private life is concerned, Mr Orr chooses to distract with an argument about abortion and the law, an argument that completely mis-states the law in order to appear to lend credulity and to foster his extremist position.
My op-ed charged RTL with sexual harassment, as RTL's stated disapproval of Jacinda Ardern's personal life, living with Clarke Gayford, unmarried, is an unwanted (and undeserved) intrusion into her personal sexual choices. Her private life, even if the media tell of it, is, as a fully competent consenting adult, her own business. We, the citizens, the voters, have every right - indeed an obligation - to question her policies and the conduct of her government. We just have no right to intrude into her bedroom.
I suggested that a proper remedy for its sexual harassment of the PM was an apology to her and to Mr Gayford, and for RTL to apply themselves to support Ms Ardern's policy of mitigation for the children living in poverty in our country.