CHINESE friends characterised their culture thus: "If it moves, bet on it; if it stops moving, eat it." A more local application would be, if it moves, sits still, or just plain exists, compete with it. I'm not that keen on Kiwi competitiveness simply because it's overdone, and it quickly devolves to characterisations of winners and losers -- territory of Donald Trump. That said, we might all take a moment to give ourselves a back pat over our comparative rankings in the world happiness scale. Frank Greenall's recent column on the social and economic successes of the Scandinavian countries deserves a second and third look, especially by our aspiring MPs. It turns out that the Scandinavians, starting with Norway, are in the top ranks when it comes to the happiness of their citizens. New Zealand ranked eighth just behind Canada and, significantly, six places ahead of the US, which ranked 14th.
That comparative ranking is important because of its cautionary qualities. Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs spoke about the relative decline of the US in its rankings on Bloomberg News. The US was third just a decade ago. Sachs pointed to the growing distrust of government and of civic institutions, the increasing economic and social inequality and a form of social Darwinism that sees the poor as morally deficient and giving help to fellow-man as weakness, as supporting dependency. Sachs summarises the American situation as "We're becoming a nasty nation". That's a far cry from the inspirational founding document that invokes inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
The World Happiness Scale is compiled from questionnaires of citizens by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, under the auspices of the UN. While living standards and GDP have their influence, human factors count more. Money's necessary but it alone can't buy happiness. For example, the Chinese, whose personal income has risen sharply in 25 years, are nonetheless ranked 83rd.
The criteria used in the rankings are income, healthy life expectancy, having someone to count on in times of trouble, generosity, freedom and trust (the latter measured by the absence of corruption in business and government).