WE NEED to continue the conversation about the US election. Unlike the deliberative process designed by the constitution's framers to protect democracy, this election had many of the earmarks of war.
Not simply in the take-no-prisoners vileness of both campaigns, but most clearly in casualty of truth, the usual first to go. In this assault on truth the social media, amplified by TV and then reamped by talk radio played a role.
"I read it on the internet" became the mantra of those who continued the work of making rumour become fact and fact become irrelevant to "gut feeling".
We can see the effect locally when a correspondent makes the outrageous claim that the Black Lives Matter movement "call(s) for police officers to be murdered". As only slightly less mendacious than the Pope's alleged endorsement of Trump, it is necessary to counter this lie with fact. To those interested in fact, not inflammatory nonsense, I offer this: BLM was founded by three black women in response to police killings of black men in the US. The movement it heralds is inclusive, non-violent, protest utilising democratic political means with the goal of affirming the humanity of blacks and all minorities (compared to blacklivesmatter.com).
The problem is that countering falsehoods is retail business, while concocting and spreading that horse manure is wholesale. Recall that a lie spreads round the world while truth is getting its boots on. But getting boots we must if we are to maintain a democratic dialogue that is based on fact, not fantasy.