I'm giving away my age when I say I can remember when we weren't dependent on our devices, our cell-phones and our computers, to help us manage our busy lives. The takeover has been an insidious process that began, as all things nefarious, with the promise that these things, computers, would save us a lot of time
I had an inkling that the promise was an empty one back in the 1980's when I got started playing with the first available cheaper Korean knock-off of the IBM home computer — the one that cost $3000 USD — which had a DOS-based operating system and 360K of random access memory. Just trying to set the thing up to print out a string of words on my accessory dot-matrix printer frustrated me and sucked me in to spend an all-nighter. I was still asleep when my wife, discovering my zonked-out form, wrote on the paper roll, "Are we impacted yet?"
Read more: Jay Kuten: End justifies the means
Jay Kuten: Hard to heal from poverty
Jay Kuten: Donald Trump's blood libel
"Impacted", the conversion of a noun into a verb, had some currency for a time, when suddenly lots of things were "impacted". That's one part of the collateral damage we've sustained. Computers changed our language. Suddenly "impacted" was part of everyday conversation. It's jarring to these old ears but has become part of accepted English, alas. Techies begat jargon begat geek talk begat acronyms, begat Twitter and now look at the results.
In a manner that feels correct but is difficult to quantify — the very standard of computer success — my writing ability has been diminished by my use of computers. I gave up my #2 pencil and writing pad when even I couldn't decipher the words later, in favour of an IBM Selectric that I loved. The discipline imposed by at most a second draft and carbon paper meant I had to think through and organise before getting started.