THERE was bound to be a backlash to the "Me Too" movement, and the struggle over the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the US Supreme Court is clearly part of that culture war.
"Me Too" is going to lose this battle unless there is some new and horrendous revelation of Kavanaugh's past behaviour in the next few days, and lots of people in the United States and elsewhere see this as evidence that the war itself is being lost.
That is not necessarily so, even in the United States.
And it is certainly not so in the wider world, where the supreme court of the world's biggest democracy, India, has just followed up its landmark decision in early September to decriminalise homosexuality with another judgment decriminalising adultery.
Many people deplore adultery, but as Pierre Elliott Trudeau famously said half a century ago: "There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation ... What's done in private between adults doesn't concern the criminal code."
But adultery was still a criminal offence in India until last week — and a very peculiar offence, because only men could be convicted of it.
The law dated from the time when Britain ruled India, and reflected the Victorian belief that a married woman was her husband's property. For another man to have sex with a man's wife was, therefore, a violation of the husband's property rights, and the violator should be punished by the law – whereas the woman was presumed to be unable to make her own decisions, and was therefore not legally culpable.