Guest Editorial

Steve Baron holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science & Economics. He is a published author, a regular columnist in various publications throughout NZ, the Founder of Better Democracy NZ, a former businessman and Waipa Mayoral candidate.

New Zealand is a progressive nation when it comes to democracy and politics. Our political system has changed and developed over the past millennium and is nothing like it was back in 1853, when we had our first general election.

Now that we have come to a final decision regarding our electoral system, perhaps now is the time to consider a longer election term? Yes, a scary thought for some, as it is often said that a three-year election term is too short for a good government but too long for a bad government - yet there are many aspects about a longer election term that should be considered and debated if we are to continue to improve our democracy.

There are many advantages to having a longer election term of, say, four or even five years. Some of these advantages include cost savings. Think of all the money that could be saved and used for other things if political parties only had to promote their abilities every five years instead of every three, not to mention the savings in staging elections and employing election staff. Voters wouldn't have totraipse off to polling booths so often, so there would be less inconvenience and maybe, therefore, more of us might take more interest and actually vote. This is an important aspect given such a low voter turnout at the last election - a very concerning trend which is only getting worse.

A longer election term would also give a government more time to implement its policies, with the prospect of them coming to fruition before the next election, allowing voters to make a more considered decision. As it stands with the three-year term, governments appear to rush through policy early in their term so all the difficult stuff is out of the way before the next election. No doubt this gives them a better chance of re-election because it may be another year or so before the public knows the outcome of earlier policy decisions.

It also helps the business community because they can plan ahead with confidence, having a good idea of what they can expect. When there is no confidence, business people do not invest, and the economy suffers. A longer election term would give business far more certainty.

It may surprise some people , but a longer election term is nothing new in New Zealand. Up until 1879, New Zealanders only went to the polls every five years. Other countries such as the United Kingdom, the US and Canada also have longer terms than New Zealand. The British and Canadians have a five-year election term and the Americans four years. Australia has continued with a three-year term just like us but the Senate (Upper House) has a six-year term. One could, however, argue that a longer election term does not seem to have made much difference to the above countries. There is still much argument over controversial policies, and these countries do not appear to be doing much better than New Zealand in their political decision making. There are still, however, the cost savings discussed earlier.

Discussions on a longer election term are not new to New Zealand either. In 1990 New Zealanders decided, in a government-initiated plebiscite, to keep the three-year election term. There was a very high turnout of 85.2 per cent with 69.3 per cent opting to keep the three-year term and 30.7 per cent wanting a four-year term.

The cynical would say this result was not surprising, given the distaste for the two-term Labour government of the day, which showed no interest in listening to the mority of New Zealanders' views and was hell-bent on pushing through a multitude of unpopular and divisive policies.

The downside to a longer election term is that four or five years is a long time to put up with an unpopular government. Unlike many other countries, New Zealand has very few constitutional checks and balances, which is a concern. It does not have an Upper House of Parliament , which often acts as a handbrake to policy decisions, many of which are based on party political ideology and agendas, and not necessarily with the best interests of the majority of New Zealanders at heart.

Personally, I would find it difficult to support a longer election term, and doubt New Zealanders would support one either, as much as I would like to actually see a longer one - because I simply do not trust our politicians to always make the right decisions. If, for example, the veto referendum, Citizens Initiated referendum and the Recall referendum were in place to act as a check and balance on Parliament, I think voters would make a different decision, knowing that it was they who had the final say on public policy. The trouble here is that politicians do not like to give up their power - just like turkeys don't like to vote for Christmas.

Submission details:

Submissions close on February 28. Go to www.saysomething.org.nz for more information on the Green Paper for Vulnerable Children

You can:

Email to yourresponse@childrensactionplan.govt.nz.

Mail: Green Paper for Vulnerable Children, PO Box 1556, Wellington 6140.

Visit www.saysomething.org.nz and make a submission online.

Facebook: www.facebook.com/greenpapernz

Twitter: www.twitter.com/greenpapernz