IT'S HARD to say sorry, but it's even harder to say you're sorry for a genocide. The word just sticks in the throats of those who should be saying it, as the Turks have been demonstrating for the past hundred years in the case of the Armenians of eastern Anatolia. And the Serbs have just shown themselves to be as tongue-tied in the case of the Bosnian Muslims slaughtered at Srebrenica.
The weekend marked the 20th anniversary of the murder of 7000 to 8000 people when Srebrenica was taken by Bosnian Serb forces in 1995. The town's population was swollen by refugees who had fled there to escape the "ethnic cleansing" that was being carried out against Muslims elsewhere in eastern Bosnia, because it was a United Nations-designated "safe area" defended by Nato troops. Or rather, not defended.
When the Bosnian Serbs, having surrounded Srebrenica for three years, finally moved to take it in July 1995, the UN and Nato commanders refused to use air strikes to stop them. And the Dutch troops who were there to protect the town decided they would rather live and let unarmed civilians die.
So all the Bosnian Muslim men and boys between the ages of 14 and 70 were loaded on to buses - the Dutch soldiers helped to separate them from the women and children - and driven up the road a few kilometres. Then they were shot by Serbian killing squads and buried by bulldozers. It took four days to murder them all.
The crime has been been formally declared a genocide by the UN war crimes tribunal for former Yugoslavia. The Bosnian Serb president of the time, Radovan Karadzic, and the Serbian military commander at Srebrenica, General Ratko Mladic, are awaiting verdicts in trials for directing genocide. You would think that even the Serbs cannot deny that it was a genocide, but you would be wrong.