Editorial: Great potential for live-streamed debates

Anna Wallis PHOTO/FILE

LIKE lots of other people I looked in at the council debates last week via Facebook. It was the first time the Chronicle had live streamed proceedings. It looked pretty good for what was in all honesty a bit of a number eight wire job.

Much of the credit must go to Chronicle photographer Stuart Munro who jacked it all up with some high-tech gear which included bits of cardboard. His efforts overcame a number of issues and, judging by the comments, were much appreciated.

There is nothing like being there, but it was a good feeling being part of delivering the crucial debates chaired by Chronicle editor Mark Dawson to the rest of the world.

And it did feel like a big community watching.

But what also struck me is how many candidates were poor speakers. And no matter what you say, how you say it will always influence people.

I was drawn to those who had their ideas sorted out, who were clear and concise. And it wasn't always those you might expect - that is business people - who were the best. I won't necessarily vote for them but I appreciated their polish.

It is a shallow view, and we all know the carnage great speakers have caused. Conversely we also know people who have overcome great obstacles to take part in public life.

And to be fair, it is brave standing for council and nerves got the better of some. But a basic of life in the public eye is regard for your listeners, or viewers and to present a well ordered, easily understood message - even of complicated ideas.

But back to the meetings streamed on Facebook - many people have commented on how easy it seemed and why aren't councils doing this already?

It's a fair question. If the candidates meetings are worth watching, what they do in the next three years if elected is doubly so.