'WHAT you don't know won't hurt you." Not true. What you don't know may well hurt you. That notion may go far to explain the reception of booing Mr Key received at Ratana when he tried to claim that Maori rights under the Treaty of Waitangi would be respected under the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
Key's threat of loss of trade to the competition of Australia didn't persuade Maori leaders like Rahui Papa, who asked for the agreement to be delayed until there could be public understanding and discussion among all New Zealanders.
From what we now know, with the TPP text released on November 5, 2015, all New Zealanders are potentially at risk. Analysis by a New Zealand organisation and a US one with serious reservations about the alleged benefits may be found here: http://itsourfuture.org.nz/tppa-text. The actual text is 6000-plus pages and hardly a page-turner. While I've given consideration to several of the provisions, I, like many - including Mr Key, I suspect - will rely on analyses by others of more dogged determination. After all, Proust it is not.
Mr Key's government has given bland assurances, including a guesstimate of a 3per cent increase to GDP by 2020. That's $6 billion and nothing to sneeze at but evidence for it is thin. Most of the tariff reductions National extols will have already been done by prior agreement.
The corporations who wrote the TPP are not as interested in fostering trade - that would go on anyway - as they are in weakening regulations that may hamper their activities in considerations of safety, health or the environment. One threat, according to a Canadian analysis (http://thinkpol.ca/2015/11/07/tpp-chapter-by-chapter-analysis/) could be to border controls on agricultural products. Weakening of MAF regulations may prove damaging to New Zealand farmers.