Radio New Zealand, a tax-payer funded network, this year sent 11 staff to cover Waitangi day events on the marae and treaty grounds. On the Monday prior, one producer revealed that news coverage was going to 'concentrate on protests'. He was right. As early as Tuesday their news bulletin began with a story on the hikoi even if, at that stage, the protestors had another 30 kilometres or so to reach the marae.
Still, and almost predictably, it took a Harawira to provide copy fodder for media by being ejected from the marae until a lone protestor tossed a bag of pilchards at dignitaries but which didn't actually hit anyone. The NZ Herald used this as a lead story and carried the shocking news that protestors "held their banners high" which, one supposes, is what banner-wavers are supposed to do.
Meanwhile, on the same day on Yahoo NZ, headlines were a little more strident. "Protestors Call For MP's Sacking" we were told before being informed that while the hikoi delayed the PM's arrival on to Te Tii Marae they were "largely peaceful and goodnatured", a fairly important fact (one would think) but not reflected in the headlines.
In fact, what did those banners and flags "carried high" by protestors tell us? On Waitangi Day protestors marching to the meeting house held a "no deep sea drilling" banner (as expected), one lonely New Zealand flag, Tino Rangatiratanga and the United Tribes flags (as expected), a flag showing combinations of all three and (curiously) one flag each from Fiji and Tonga. Two men held a sign showing the date of Samoan Independence from New Zealand and why, wasn't made clear.
This year crowd numbers were down considerably over previous years so what does that tell us? Probably that people don't like outdoor events in the wet but a Yahoo NZ poll on the 7th gave other clues. Of the 2929 respondents (at the time of viewing) 94% said they didn't celebrate the day but liked the time off, 5 percent said they celebrated the occasion and 1% weren't sure at all.