How then could the lobster stock survive the onslaught.
I asked, and was given a book setting out the history.
In the 1950s the government decided to regulate the Maine lobster men. They responded by saying, let us try first, we know the fishery best. If we fail, OK, you come in then and take over.
They formed themselves into a co-operative and made their rules. Firstly, they decided to protect their breeding stock. They identified that large lobster females and males had 10,000 times more eggs or sperm than small lobster — not 10,000 more, 10,000 times more — so they decided to protect them, male and female.
All lobster over 4lb caught in a pot would be thrown back. Further, any female taken with eggs would be thrown back, but before she was thrown back her tail would be notched to mark her as a breeder, and from then on if she was taken in a pot, eggs or not, she would be thrown back.
Then to allow them to grow to a marketable size, all lobster taken below 2lb would be thrown back. We watched the lobster boats work, a pot pulled up with eight or 10 lobster, and we'd watch as most were tossed back into the sea.
Surprise surprise, decade after decade the lobster industry thrives, the co-operative manages it.
And the government-regulated cod industry is dead.
The lesson from this is loud and clear and obvious. Don't kill your breeding stock. Look at what has happened to the cod fishery. Look at our wider fishing industry.
Why are they allowed to target egg-bearing females when they school to spawn? How insane is that, killing the egg-filled female before she lays the eggs for the next generation? And the bureaucrats prattle on about sustainable management.
The Maine lobster management system should be introduced here urgently, and in the wider fishing industry, as a start each species should have a closed season when they are spawning. How can any species survive when you kill off the breeding stock?
DANNY SIMMS
Mangonui