The students at Windley School are lucky to have a breakfast club, run most days by volunteers from Arise Church and school staff, but many low-decile schools are missing out or receive support and funding on an ad hoc basis from various NGOs and community groups.
Certainly the government doesn't want to get involved - they are trying to farm out social services such as housing. They don't want to take on any more initiatives, even though every charity that works with impoverished families thinks school meals are a great idea.
Feeding hungry kids is surely a moral obligation in a country that can afford to do so.
It is also just the beginning of what needs to be done to break the cycle of poverty that is trapping too many families. It is almost two years since the Children's Commissioner's Experts Advisory Group released its report with 72 solutions to child poverty, but it was largely sidelined. Boosting family incomes is the obvious key to reducing poverty, but that will take time and investment. In the meantime, children still need energy to learn.
The Treasury paper from February 2013 warned that if the government itself got involved in providing food in schools there was a risk of "scope creep" uncontrolled or continuous growth in costs. It pointed out that the government already supplied fruit in low-decile schools, and the likes of KidsCan, Fonterra and Sanitarium ran breakfast clubs. The fear of spending too much money is apparently a good justification for spending hardly any at all.
Treasury recommended more research on the extent of the problem and engaging with existing providers of food in schools to understand the level of need.
Meanwhile, as the numbers are crunched, children are going hungry through no fault of their own. As Treasury pointed out, not every child who misses breakfast does so because of a lack of food, but tens of thousands do. Many of these children went to bed hungry in the first place. And then we ask them to come to school for a mentally-and-physically exhausting day of learning.
Inevitably, in a discussion such as this, some people will blame the parents for inadequate budgeting, but whether parents could have stretched the grocery budget more effectively or not, the fact remains that children in our First World country are going hungry.
If you don't have compassion for hungry kids in this land flowing with milk and Weet-Bix, you could consider what a drain on the public purse their poor health and educational under-achievement will be in the future.
For the government to depend on charities and corporate philanthropy to meet the needs of the increasing number of families that are falling through the cracks is like baling a sinking boat with a tea cup.
Certainly the government needs to focus on growing the economy and creating jobs that families can afford to live on. But please, in the meantime, can we also ensure no child has to learn and grow on an empty stomach?
What's good for the weakest and most vulnerable amongst us is good for all of us.
JUDITH NOWOTARSKI
President
NZEI Te Riu Roa
