The Green Party's apparent unwillingness to even have a discussion on the potential of genetic engineering to provide solutions to some of the country's most pressing environmental issues was extremely disappointing according to Federated Farmers spokesman Andrew Hoggard.
"Terse answers from Climate Change Minister James Shaw to Parliamentary questions this week indicate the Greens find the GE topic too hot to handle, but discussions on pragmatic and science-based policies should not be held to ransom by merely trying to keep a vocal section of your political party's membership happy," he said.
There had been "plenty" of media reports about a ryegrass developed by NZ AgResearch using gene editing, which could substantially reduce methane emissions from cattle, he added. Under current laws the grass could not be grown in New Zealand, however, and field trials were having to take place in the United States.
National's climate change spokesman Todd Muller had asked Mr Shaw if he agreed with the former Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor, Sir Peter Gluckman, that New Zealand agriculture would struggle to be sustainable in the long-term without using gene editing.
Mr Shaw's one-word reply was 'No, the same reply he gave when asked if he agreed with Sir Peter that '… there is no way that we will get a reduction in methane production, and I can see no way that we will see an economic advantage for farmers as we shift to more plant-based foods, without using gene editing'," Mr Hoggard said.