However, he said he understood the ministry’s position was the High Court decision had not changed its direction on mandated water fluoridation.
Sephton said WDC was continuing with fluoridation as directed.
However, that did not mean the council would continue with this if Ministry of Health instructions changed.
The Ministry of Health/Manatū Hauora did not specifically respond when asked whether the High Court decision meant WDC’s order to fluoridate would be cancelled.
A Ministry of Health/Manatū Hauora spokesperson said it had received Friday’s High Court decision and was considering it.
“The decision pertains to the process required to be used in deciding to issue a direction,” the spokesperson said.
“The judgment is not about the public health merits of fluoridation or whether fluoridation can be justified under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990,” she said.
Brett said continuing with the costly implementation of water fluoridation was a waste of ratepayer and taxpayer money.
WDC baulked at the Government’s mandate in a divided and fractious council meeting in early October.
But later, at an October 26 meeting, the council committed to fluoridation, approving an extra unbudgeted $2.9m towards the $4.5m fluoridation costs, on top of $1.6m already put aside.
The Ministry of Health would in turn fund $4.4m of this.
It also awarded the $3.7m contract for the fluoridation construction at the same time.
Mayor Vince Cocurullo and Deputy Mayor Phil Halse were among all but one of the 13 WDC politicians present on October 26 who voted in favour of the additional funding and the fluoridation construction contract.
Councillor Gavin Benney was against doing so, while councillor Paul Yovich was absent.
The politicians also decided to write to the incoming Government seeking urgent clarification on whether it supported the fluoridation mandate. The new Government has still not been formed.
Sephton said after that meeting the council would not be seeking an injunction to stop the fluoridation’s implementation. Its legal advice indicated any attempt to do so would prove expensive and likely be contested by the Ministry of Health.
He said the council faced up to $200,000 in fines for not fluoridating in the face of the July 2022 directive, and further fines of $10,000 a day during which the offence occurred.
Friday’s High Court decision was issued in the case of Christchurch-based natural health lobby group New Health New Zealand vs the Director General of Health.
Brett said it was a victory for common sense.
The $4.5m GST-exclusive fluoridation cost for WDC’s drinking water does not include the added up to $1m to fluoridate the council’s Poroti drinking water during the plant’s upgrade.
Fluoridation will also cost $100,000 a year to run.
Under the Government WDC directive, fluoridation for the Whau Valley water treatment plant must be in place by the middle of next year and by the end of 2024 for Ruakākā, Maunu and Waipū. It is required for the Poroti water supply by June 2026.
Despite proceeding with the fluoridation plan, WDC politicians on October 26 also decided to ask Whangārei residents what they thought of adding fluoride to the council’s public water supplies.
The process for doing this will be worked out at a November 23 council meeting.
■ Local Democracy Reporting is Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air
