Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Simon Upton's report on methane emissions — which is in the form of a 'note' by Dr Andy Reisinger of the New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre — confirms how confused scientists are about methane and its impact on global warming, says Pastural Farming Climate Research Inc chairman Robin Grieve, of Poroti.
While environmental groups reject Grieve's argument outright, he is adamant the Government has no option but to pull methane emissions out of the Carbon Zero Bill.
"Report after report has debunked the validity of the system our politicians use to quantify methane and the latest 'note' is just one more," he says. "It is a modelling exercise rather than scientific research and it is consistent with most recent reports in finding livestock emissions of methane do not need to be eliminated in the same way CO2 emissions do.
"This means the politicians have to rethink how methane emissions are treated and dump the current system of carbon accounting which does not differentiate between short lived and long lived emissions and is simply without credibility."
'Report after report has debunked the validity of the system our politicians use to quantify methane and the latest 'note' is just one more. It is a modelling exercise rather than scientific research ...'