Years working in tough low decile schools should qualify you for an honorary degree in psychology and so I asked one such colleague what she made of the outcome of The Bachelor banality that has surged like the backwash of a detritus filled tsunami wave through the nation's media.
Having let my daughter (against my inner feminist's will) watch the deluge of dross and drivel and tried my hardest to make constructive criticism sound vaguely rational and not my usual vitriolic venting, I was ecstatic with the outcome.
Vindicated that Jordan, was indeed an egg and completely lacking in any form of intelligent conversation I still couldn't cope with the fact that more than a few of the women seemed so needy of him.
Did it seem normal to the small person, I asked, that more than one of them said that they only felt as though they were half a human being without a male at their side? What did they mean they felt: "incomplete"? Were they missing limbs? Did someone forget to colour them in?
She felt that I shouldn't "diss" someone for wanting to be in a partnership. I thought that was a very different prospect than declaring to the world that one wasn't "complete" without one.