I read with interest Joanne McNeill's opinion piece in Tuesday's Advocate, however I would like to clarify a few areas in the piece that are of a concern and could be potentially misleading regarding the sunscreen example that she used.
The levels of UV (ultraviolet) radiation exposure in NZ are extremely high due to our low level of air pollution compared with that of Europe. The most common cause of skin cancer is too much exposure to UV radiation from the sun.
Overexposure to UV radiation causes the skin permanent damage. Skin cancer is New Zealand's most common cancer, with melanoma the most serious type, killing more people per year than road accidents. Sunscreens have evolved into effective formulations especially made for NZ conditions. A behaviour change can take at least 15 to 20 years for it to be effective and part of a daily lifestyle.
Due to health-promoting messages, sunscreen use has increased and this is evident with the younger generation coming through - children learn by example. It is important to give people accurate health promotion messages so they can make an informed choice of the benefits of using sunscreen versus the outcome of potential skin cancer later on in life.
Sunscreen formulations are now far more effective with greater levels of UVA/UVB broad spectrum protection and without the high level of chemicals that were used previously.