The content of the project was substantially unchanged and the project had already been rejected by council.
Sure enough, it became clear that the assessment criteria would advantage a project that had had years of development and considerable financial assistance (including at least $1.7 million in ratepayer funding, not to mention council staff time and resources) over any proposal that had been put together as an expression of interest over a matter of weeks.
Hence the notice of motion.
It was my, and others', hope that at this latest meeting, council would essentially ratify its June decision, and again reject the HAC proposal.
Because the reality is that, until that happens, genuinely new proposals for the use of the Harbour Board Building cannot be considered in a fair and reasonable way.
Tricia Cutforth
Councillor, Denby Ward
What do you think? Comment below.