Have your say: Animal concern

Stock transport needs a shake up to be made safer, says a reader.

Does our stock transport system need a shake-up?

Yes, without a doubt, in my view. The recently published article headed "Going the distance" was very welcome.

But, with the exception of some informative, independent and unbiased opinions of a Massey University Veterinarian and the director of Safe there was little to impress.

An anonymous MPI officer said: "The transport industry is closely monitored along the transport chain" and "Transport operators are monitored at saleyards by MPI staff and all export livestock premises have MPI veterinarians monitoring the welfare of animals transported to slaughter."

Firstly, just how is the "transport industry closely monitored along the transport chain"? With about 12-14 inspectors nationwide?

It is just not possible. You do the maths.

And secondly, my information via MPI, is that their inspectors do not attend saleyards on a regular basis.

Ken Shirley (Road Transport Forum) is apparently happy with the monitoring regime, but it would be interesting to know if he believes in taking that constructive final step, namely enforcement? Damien O'Connor (Labour) makes it clear that he does - Thank you, Mr O'Connor.

It is common knowledge, of course, that stock are inspected at their destination - the abattoir - but the horse with a broken leg which came off a stock and trailer unit at the Christchurch rest area didn't make it that far (April 2, 2011).

Elizabeth McFarlane
Animal Advocate
(Founder of International League for the Protection of Horses NZ Inc)

What do you think? Comment below.