Associate Education Minister David Seymour announced a plan to achieve 80 per cent of students being present for more than 90 per cent of the term by 2030.
Northland principals say the approach has been oversimplified and more time should be dedicated to resourcing schools and understanding individual needs.
As part of the Government’s plan, there would beweekly publishing of attendance data from Term 2, rolling out a communications campaign, clarifying attendance expectations with school boards and updating public health guidance for sick students.
Future proposals include mandating attendance reporting by 2025, developing a traffic light system with clear obligations for non-attending students, making attendance a priority for school boards, as well as using “improved data and analysis” to distinguish drivers of non-attendance.
Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Ngaringaomatariki principal Reno Skipper said schools were already doing all they could to improve attendance but adding more to the load without resourcing was counterproductive.
Skipper said rewarding students whose attendance hadimproved and taking a personal approach to truant students has worked at his kura. This has included petrol and food vouchers, or purchasing uniforms for whānau.
Tai Tokerau Principals Association president Brendon Morrisey, principal of Kaitāia Primary School, said there were varied reasons for low attendance.
Improving attendance was best decided by schools, he said.
“My main message is to stop making decisions from the central body that are not aligned with what’s happening locally, and really dedicate more time to learning about that local voice.”
Morrisey said schools know their community’s needs best and they should be resourced to meet those needs.
His school provides free stationery and transport, which he credited to better attendance from previously truant students.
“Give us a chance to create the local solutions.”
While details around how attendance data will be published remain murky, Morrisey said publishing and traffic light ranking of student attendance could be damaging.
He would prefer to see more support for whānau rather than “kicking them while they’re down.”
“It’s [the plan] a nice little soundbite the public can agree with as if it’s simple and obvious, but it’s not simple and it’s not obvious. It’s complex.”
Morrisey would like to see a less confronting approach adopted, such as putting more resources into attendance officers.
Seymour told Checkpoint this week he could not guarantee more officers nor rule it out.
“If we make it our goal to employ more people and throw more resources and money at it, we lose sight of the real goal which is kids going to school, so yep, more people [employed] is a possibility, not going to guarantee it’s going to happen.”
Hora Hora Primary School principal Pat Newman, who has more than 50 years of teaching experience, said it was clear the action plan was based on the ideas of individuals with the same political philosophy.
He said the future Seymour was talking about was already here and placed emphasis on the need for local voices to be heard when developing plans.
However, publishing attendance data and ranking students through a traffic light system seemed pointless, he said, when schools were already identifying truant students.
“The biggest problem in learning and attendance is socio-economics. Who decides the socio-economics? The politicians.”