There is also no point in arguing what a car could have done to prolong life.
If an airbag didn't go off, that's probably going to make things more injurious, but what has to be remembered is cars are designed to drive on roads at speed, and be completely responsive to a driver.
Cars are not designed to be driven into power poles and trees, and it is quite likely that a whole lot of things will go wrong when something that catastrophic happens - including the car catching on fire. Seriously, are you going to sue the car company for doing something a car is never designed to do?
Fortunately in New Zealand we don't seem to have a blame-the-car culture.
We can, in some situations, blame the road, in instances of petrol or diesel spills. But what police will always consider is: why did this crash happen, when hundreds of cars crossed the same spot without incident? Why did this person lose control, when everyone else today has driven straight?
The Herald ran a story of how relieved two parents were when a coroner ruled it could not be proven that texting had contributed to their daughter's car crash. Nonetheless, she did crash, and there will be a reason why she lost control after overcorrecting.
We make texting the ultimate crime, but inattention is the killer, and that's likely what happened.