However, in my opinion, the red discs are a cheapskate, pathetic cop-out for not doing the job properly.
I am totally aware of the maintenance challenges, of keeping beacons operational, but that is absolutely no excuse for not delineating the crossing, to the maximum level possible.
Excuses relating to the lamp life don't wash, robust bulbs and flasher units are available.
Human factors, such as driver distraction and/or excess speed, pedestrian complacency, in expecting cars to stop, can lead to accidents at crossings, but it is the pedestrian who cops the brunt of the impact.
An overbridge is not a viable alternative. Mobility access rules require long wheelchair-friendly ramps, either side of the crossing.
A bridge would also have to be fully caged to prevent missiles being hurled at traffic beneath.
Pedestrian traffic signals may be an answer, but unless there is a reasonably constant pedestrian demand, drivers become used to not having to stop and may not respond when there is a red signal.
Overhead signals would be a must at such a crossing.
Alternatively flashing dual amber lights, activated by a pedestrian button, are an effective warning to drivers, but can again lead to pedestrian compliancy.
I had a guest editorial published 26 months ago, which ended by asking "How much is a child's life worth?" I don't accept excuses about financial allocations, budgets and scheduling of improvements.
How quickly would these improvements have been introduced if the crossing was in a higher socioeconomic area, such as Maunu Rd?
- Dave Murray is a retired roading, drainage and traffic engineer, and former traffic management consultant to government departments and local bodies.