Changes to the way people pay for transmission of their electricity should not impose a shock on Northlanders' power bills, the Electricity Authority says.
The government agency's controversial Transmission Pricing Methodology review is back on track to ensure consumers paid only for network upgrades they directly benefited from.
Last year, the EA put the review on hold after the 11th-hour discovery of a raft of errors in the cost-benefit analysis on which the plan was based. Errors included locating power stations on the wrong island and overstating the Far North's power consumption by a factor of 10.
The stated aim of the review was to ensure consumers paid only for network upgrades they directly benefited from. If it had gone ahead power prices would have increased sharply in Auckland and Northland and dropped in Southland, which is close to the country's biggest power stations.
This week, the EA signalled it would continue to look into benefit-based charging as part of a new proposal for transmission pricing. It needs to prepare a cost-benefit analysis and modelling of potential impacts as part of finalising a formal proposal for consultation.