Public hospitals cannot be expected to offer private rooms for patients; most people accept that the price would be prohibitive and the medical care itself is the more important thing. But we can be pleased that the vast hospital wards of yesteryear with a military matron on patrol seem
Wyn Drabble: Cone of silence needed in hospitals
I’d like you to think back a bit, if you’re old enough, to TV’s Get Smart. When Agent Smart and The Chief needed to discuss top secret business that nobody else could hear, they used the “cone of silence”: a perspex-looking dome which they lowered over themselves and within which they carried on their private conversation.
To the outside viewer, there were two men inside whose lips were moving but only lip-readers could have picked up the gist of what they were saying. (“Do we really need to keep spying? Doesn’t Facebook do that for us these days?”)
Back to the four-bed hospital room where the doctor is visiting one of the four and it’s time for the big reveal with diagnosis and gritty data, some of it quite personal. As soon as doctors draw close to the bed they will automatically close the curtain: the hospital’s cone of silence.
It’s clearly a well-practised move. They do it without thinking because they want the message to be delivered to the patient only and not to all and sundry within earshot and they seem to believe the shower curtain of silence will do the trick. Even the doctors can find it difficult to verbalise some of their findings.
Does the hospital’s cone of silence work? Not at all. It’s about as soundproof as a limp moist towelette. Like it or not, the other three in the room plus the visitors walking past down the corridor are all going to be able to hear the grisly details. The privacy curtains serve no acoustic/sonic function.
Naturally, I’ve been working on a possible solution. If I say my initial idea stays with the Maxwell Smart theme, astute readers will have predicted what I am about to say. But don’t ask me yet as I need a little more time to finalise details.
Impatient reader (interrupting): Is it a shoe phone?
Me: I told you not to ask me that.
Impatient reader: Sorry about that, Chief.
But, yes, the reader is right. I’m thinking shoe phones. Of course, there has to be an important add-on. The users would each need to wear a hood of silence otherwise it would be no different from what currently exists.
So shoe phones and hoods of silence it is. It’s our way forward to privacy.
Sorry, must dash now – my prototype shoe phone is ringing.