Ms Hammond, who represented herself during the hearing, was today awarded $168,070.88 in damages following the release of chairman Roger Haines and tribunal members Wendy Gilchrist and Brian Neeson's decision today.
"The Tribunal is that it is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that an action of NZCU Baywide was an interference with the privacy of Ms Hammond," the decision read.
"Baywide interfered with the privacy of Ms Hammond by disclosing personal information about her."
Damages of $98,000 were awarded for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings, and $38,350 was awarded for lost income, and being a pecuniary loss suffered as a result of the interference.
Damages of $15,543.10 were awarded for pecuniary loss in the form of legal expenses, while $16,177.78 was awarded for the loss of a benefit Ms Hammond might reasonably have expected to obtain.
An order was also made that Baywide be restrained from continuing or repeating the interference, or from engaging in, or causing or permitting others to engage in, conduct of the same kind.
Baywide is also forced to send a retraction of an April 12, 2012 email warning about Ms Hammond along with a copy of the decision to Red Consulting Group, Able Personnel, Adecco and Grow HR.
Baywide was also ordered to request that the email sent by Baywide human resource manger Louise Alexandra and any screenshot of the cake sent by her and any copy be deleted.
A report is also to be provided to the Tribunal and to Ms Hammond detailing the steps taken in compliance with this order and the responses received by NZCU Baywide.
An order was also made that Baywide CEO Gavin Earle forward to all members of staff a retraction of his April 13, 2012 email about the dispute along with an apology to Ms Hammond.
Baywide, in conjunction with the Privacy Commissioner and at its own expense, will also provide training to its management staff in relation to their and the company's obligations under the Privacy Act 1993 in order to ensure they are aware of these obligations.
