It has been reported that I walked out of this public-excluded council meeting when the issue was being discussed, though I prefer to say I was not willing to continue taking part in a process I considered farcical. I believed it wrong that the media and public were prevented from hearing details of a proposal to spend nearly $2 million of ratepayers' money.
There was a lack of transparency and an inability or unwillingness to answer many crucial questions, plus it was clear I would have no impact on the outcome. The entire process seemed staged to endorse an outcome that had already been decided on.
Some of my specific concerns were:
-The clubs were not represented so councillors had no opportunity to question those running these organisations.
-The only accounts provided were for the RSA March 2014 financial year. There were no forecasts, budgets or estimates for the proposed combined clubs which meant councillors could not assess the financial viability of the new entity.
-It was claimed a new city centre premises would benefit the Hastings CBD, which clearly is already struggling, yet no evidence was provided to demonstrate linkage between the clubs and the CBD, even though the RSA and National Service Clubs are presently within walking distance of the shops. Additionally, only the RSA will be shifting and the National Service Club will remain close to the CBD.
-No membership history was provided so past and future trends could not be determined, nor was there any information on how many members use the facilities on a regular basis.
-Claims the viability of the three clubs would have been enhanced failed to account for the additional risk of their taking on significant debt which could have imperilled rather than secured their future.
-Some councillors claimed a similar combined facility in Blenheim proved it would work, yet no specifics were provided.
My own view is this matter has been handled in a highly unsatisfactory manner, without councillors being given much of the information needed to make a wise decision. The cost in staff time is unknown but must be considerable and a figure of $10,000 seems possible.
While some public consultation had been proposed people are busy with their jobs, family and other issues, and rely on good governance by their councillors to make sure their money is spent wisely.
Expecting widespread and representative community involvement in submissions is unrealistic.
This is yet another example of the council being steamrolled into supporting an idea of doubtful benefit. Yet had it proceeded, debt and rates for everyone would have increased.
-Simon Nixon is a Hastings district councillor.
-Business and civic leaders, organisers, experts in their field and interest groups can contribute opinions. The views expressed here are the writer's personal opinion and not the newspaper's. Email: editor@hbtoday.co.nz.
