Hawkes Bay Today
  • Hawke's Bay Today home
  • Latest news
  • Sport
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Video
  • Death notices
  • Classifieds

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • On The Up
  • Sport
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
    • All Property
    • Residential property listings
  • Rural
    • All Rural
    • Dairy farming
    • Sheep & beef farming
    • Horticulture
    • Animal health
    • Rural business
    • Rural life
    • Rural technology

Locations

  • Napier
  • Hastings
  • Havelock North
  • Central Hawke's Bay
  • Tararua

Media

  • Video
  • Photo galleries
  • Today's Paper - E-Editions
  • Photo sales
  • Classifieds

Weather

  • Napier
  • Hastings
  • Dannevirke
  • Gisborne

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / Hawkes Bay Today

Pauline Elliot: Risks leave dam dead in water

By Pauline Elliot
Hawkes Bay Today·
18 Dec, 2014 03:38 AM4 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  Sign in here

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save

    Share this article

Pauline Elliott

Pauline Elliott

Earlier this month around 100 people attended a public meeting in Waipawa, hosted by Transparent Hawke's Bay Inc (THB). The meeting sought to provide a safe and open forum for people to discuss and ask questions around the RWSS; and there were indeed many questions.

This week, we got the answer to one of them: "How much water is actually signed up, unconditionally?" Not the 40 million cubes needed to make this scheme a "goer"; not the 40 million cubes we were told by the dam promoters, including Irrigation NZ and Federated Farmers, that had been reached to bring the scheme "over the line"; not even close to the assurance from these players that "we've met the target". We now learn there is unconditional agreement for just 5 million cubes. At the Waipawa meeting, we also got an answer to a second question: is the scheme viable?

Guest speaker Peter Fraser gave an alarmingly clear "No, it is not".

Fraser, a recognised expert in his field, and using HBRIC's own analysis, showed that apart from the build phase there will be no net benefit to our communities, but a staggering loss over the term of the scheme even if, in the unlikely event, all farmers sign up to all available water over the term of the scheme.

Another "No, it is not viable" came from Barrie Ridler. Farm advisor, farmer and former senior lecturer in farm economics at Massey University, Mr Ridler was able to demonstrate unequivocally that the on-farm numbers simply do not stack up.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Andrew Wilson, a CHB farmer who has lived and farmed in the area throughout his farming career, pointed out that other aspects of climate (cold, winds, frosts, rainfall when not wanted) affect crop and pasture production as much, or more, than water. He also shared his current observation of schemes in the US (which is home for half each year), where small towns withered away after irrigation brought large corporates and seasonal, low-paid workers into a region.

Are we being sold a dummy? What drives this scheme? Is it an enthusiasm for building a large dam? Is it political? You can be sure that bankers, landowners, lawyers, and developers will lap up the rewards! Are there investors keen to do the same? Not yet!

So - where does this leave us as ratepayer investors in a scheme that does not stack up financially or economically? Nor, we are now being told by the High Court, environmentally?

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

What are the facts? The really important ones are hard to come by. A blanket "commercial sensitivity" ensures the public does not have access to any facts that might give a sense of comfort around our $80 million investment, or the long term liability of ratepayers if Peter Fraser's analysis proves to be right " and evidence suggests it is.

It should ring alarm bells that our Regional Council and its investment company are developers and promoters of this scheme, while still retaining the role of granting consents, managing, monitoring, and regulating those consents, with the added requirement to maximise return on investment for private and corporate shareholders. Ratepayers do not feature as investors!

Here are questions that the public want answers to:

1) What entity carries, monitors, and regulates water user agreements? Is it HBRIC; Ruataniwha Limited Partnership; Ruataniwha General Partnership; or something else?

Discover more

Dam needs more farmers to succeed

17 Dec 05:00 AM

Fenton Wilson: Dam scheme a workable plan

17 Dec 04:20 AM

Dam companies asked to 'share pain'

18 Dec 06:00 AM

$370m Treaty 'pool' for Bay

21 Dec 09:00 PM

2) Who, or what entity, monitors, manages and regulates consents for water take?

3) What volume of water has unconditional, signed agreements for water take?

4) A number of farmers have indicated a commitment (conditional) for five years at 10c per m3. What proportion of water volume at this rate, will contribute to the required 40m m3, and what is the impact on projected revenue?

5) Are farmers being offered incentives to sign a water user agreement?

6) What is the cost to taxpayer/ratepayer per year in subsidising irrigation water? 7) At what point over the life of the scheme could ratepayers reasonably expect a return on investment?

8)As an investment in economic development, were any alternatives considered before proceeding with feasibility of the dam structure?

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

9) What is the legal accountability/liability of Regional Councillors and investment company directors for the scheme?

These questions are currently with the Regional Council awaiting response.

Feedback from our Waipawa meeting asks for more such meetings, and THB will be planning these in the New Year, along with a request for workshops for farmers.

We do need water. RWSS as stands, is not the answer.-Pauline Elliott is the chair of Transparent Hawke's Bay.

-Business and civic leaders, organisers, experts in their field and interest groups can contribute opinions.

Email: editor@hbtoday.co.nz. Views expressed are those of the writer, not the newspaper.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Save

    Share this article

Latest from Hawkes Bay Today

Hawkes Bay Today

House damaged by fire in Maraenui

03 Jul 05:19 AM
Hawkes Bay Today

Claims councillor breached code of conduct by saying Napier had 'ignored its core infrastructure'

03 Jul 04:45 AM
Hawkes Bay Today

Wider, stronger and quieter: New one-lane bridge coming for Napier-Wairoa Rd

03 Jul 04:07 AM

There’s more to Hawai‘i than beaches and buffets – here’s how to see it differently

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from Hawkes Bay Today

House damaged by fire in Maraenui

House damaged by fire in Maraenui

03 Jul 05:19 AM

It was one of two fires within 15 minutes.

Claims councillor breached code of conduct by saying Napier had 'ignored its core infrastructure'

Claims councillor breached code of conduct by saying Napier had 'ignored its core infrastructure'

03 Jul 04:45 AM
Wider, stronger and quieter: New one-lane bridge coming for Napier-Wairoa Rd

Wider, stronger and quieter: New one-lane bridge coming for Napier-Wairoa Rd

03 Jul 04:07 AM
'Go for your dreams': 22-year-old Māori cloak maker reaching international markets

'Go for your dreams': 22-year-old Māori cloak maker reaching international markets

03 Jul 12:24 AM
From early mornings to easy living
sponsored

From early mornings to easy living

NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • Hawke's Bay Today e-edition
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Subscribe to the Hawke's Bay Today
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • The Northern Advocate
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • NZME Events
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP