We hear a lot about the "housing crisis" in New Zealand, especially the shortage of affordable houses in Auckland that is pushing a generation of would-be home buyers out of the market. But is the underlying problem really a critical shortage of housing? House price inflation in Auckland, and the spillover to the regions, is an issue of supply and demand " but it's not the supply of housing stock that is the main problem. The real culprit is the easy supply of money.
New Zealanders have a love affair with owning property and the banking industry reforms of the 1980s and '90s allowed many to buy second and third properties. Deregulation meant banks had more money to lend and access to funds became easy. Punters had more cash to spend on housing - so they did.
Before the 1990s, most New Zealanders had mortgage financing from the Housing Corporation and it was generally not possible to have more than one mortgage. As the new millennium dawned, people who had been burned by the stock market in 1987 invested in property and relied on capital gains to see them right. In 2010, after recovering from the finance company debacle and the global financial crisis, they again turned to investment in residential property with a vengeance.
It is worth pointing out that housing cost in Auckland as a percentage of household income has only increased from 16.8 per cent in 2007 to 18.8 per cent in 2015; although it is lower in the rest of the country. There is also evidence from government and private sector reports that high rents are causing a higher incidence of homelessness and residential overcrowding in Auckland.
Our two largest political parties are responding to these events in similar, but equally useless, ways " in essence by throwing bricks and mortar at the problem. Both are claiming it's only a housing supply problem. Labour is getting "back to its roots", announcing a large building programme to provide low-cost housing to those wanting to get into home ownership. National, on the other hand, is tinkering with KiwiSaver entitlements and offering a billion-dollar interest-free loan to councils. History tells us both are attacking the problem from the wrong direction.